talking about God’s warriors on CNN:
As one of readers of this blog did point it out: ” To get an accurate comparison, there should have been a comparison to atheistic warriors.”
It is hard to overlook that atheists like Pol Pot! Mao and Stalin killed more than any religious warriors !! After all atheism is just another religion with its own dogmas its own rituals and more aggressive and intolerant as any religion ever.
Obviously that programs like “God’s warriors” are targeting religion in general and Christianity in the first place . So, by doing that these programs are, de-facto, is propaganda of atheism . Why nobody would address issue of atheism and all destruction that atheism inflicted on civilization? Nobody is interested in destructive historical role of atheisms just because Bush cannot be blamed for that ?
Filed under 2008 voter, Analysis, anti -religious propaganda, atheism, atheistic, CNN, God’s Warriors, Gods warriors, Mao, Muslim terrorism, Muslims, Pol Pot, propaganda, propaganda of atheism, religion, religious warriors
CNN Presents God’s Warriors . Despite the all spin that CNN did put into the program the idea to compare Jewish, Christian and Muslim religious radicals is very productive. If we will go beyond what CNN is omitting in its program and we will compare side by side the Jewish, Christian and Muslims “ God warriors” few things will be obvious from that comparison :
- “ Muslim warriors” are only religious warriors who are supported by state ( Iran is an example)
- “ Muslim warriors” are only religious warriors who operate globally and have a goal of imposing its religion as religion on others
- “ Muslim warriors” are only religious warriors who operate in the countries and territories which are out of the historical borders of its religion ( Muslims terrorism in USA and Europe)
- “ Muslim warriors” are only religious warriors who are practicing strategy of intentional mass deliberate killing of civilians
- “ Muslim warriors” are only religious warriors who have own armies with rockets and artillery : Hezbollah
- “ Muslim warriors” are only religious warriors who control entire countries ( Afghanistan, Somalia until recently and Iran today )
- “ Muslim warriors” are only religious warriors who are attacking sovereign countries ( Hezbollah attacked Israel)
- “ Muslim warriors” are only religious warriors who have under military control entire territories (Gaza , Somalia)
So the whole idea to equalize Jewish, Christian and Muslims is disingenuous .
Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, 9/11, Afghanistan, Al-qaida, Analysis, Christian, Christianity, CNN, Gaza, God’s Warriors, Gods warriors, Hezbollah, Iran, Islam, Islamic Republic, Islamic Republic of Iran, Israel, Lebanon war, London bombing, Madrid bombing, Muslims, Somalia
Please, read below the excerpt from the CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF IRAN
In the formation and equipping of the country’s defence forces, due attention must be paid to faith and ideology as the basic criteria. Accordingly, the Army of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps are to be organized in conformity with this goal, and they will be responsible not only for guarding and preserving the frontiers of the country, but also for fulfilling the ideological mission of jihad in God’s way; that is, extending the sovereignty of God’s law throughout the world (this is in accordance with the Koranic verse “Prepare against them whatever force you are able to muster, and strings of horses, striking fear into the enemy of God and your enemy, and others besides them” [8:60]).
What are we talking about with a country which goal according to its own constitution is” jihad in God’s way; that is, extending the sovereignty of God’s law throughout the world”?
Indeed Islam is religion of peace and it looks like the Islamic Republic of Iran is a very positive and constructive force in the region. They are are positive that we have to be killed during their jihad and they are going to construct all necessary for Jihad conditions. So, let us negotiate how to accommodate them better.
It does not matter what you think about Newt Gingrich but he definitely can make a point. He made few appearances recently and did few keen remarks. But most interesting ones were on the FOX News Sunday With Chris Wallace” , July 29, 2007 he formulated what I think absolute and only true : neither republicans nor democrats have a vision of enormous problems we are faced with: “the Republicans don’t recognize the scale of the performance failure of government as a system, and the Democrats are living in a fantasy land in terms of their policy proposals.”(fox news)
Why I am choosing republicans today? Because I do not want to be associated with those democrats who, as Gingrich said, are “deeply opposed to American victory and deeply committed to American defeat.” (fox news)
I always was thinking that there is not anti war movement today only anti-victory . it looks like democrats are rushing to quit before we really can win, just ” punish” republicans for starting the war. You cannot say better than Gingrich: “We are faced with evil opponents. Those opponents need to be defeated. And if General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker come back in September and say, “We actually can win this thing,” I want to understand the rationale that says, “No, we don’t want to let America win. Let’s legislate defeat for the United States.” (fox news)
It is not between doves and hawks anymore . People who want to end the war by withdrawal are not doves because the are not for piece. They are for defeat. By surrendering or by “legislating defeat” as Gingrich named it they are not going to save any lives by quitting. As Gingrich said
“What I would say to any Democrat who wants America to leave is quite simple. Millions of Iraqis have sided with the United States. They are known in their neighborhoods. They are known in their cities. If we abandon them, they are going to be massacred.” (fox news)
Another Cambodia is coming to mind. So those “doves” who by pro-peace (meaning anti-victory) demagoguery are imposing on us unavoidable casualties are really vultures, not doves .
Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, Analysis, anti-war, Gingrich, GOP, Iraq, Iraq war, Islam, Islamo fascism, Jihad, middle east, Newt Gingrich, war, withdrawal
Because in 2006 “Daily Kos put itself totally in the service of Lamont.” And still Liebermann not just won but won decisively . So, Liebermann exposed lack of influence of daily kos on normal people . Liebermann proved that daily kos is overrated politically or at least he proved that you can deal against daily kos successfully. Who knows may be if daily kos did not help Lamont in 2006 Lamont would win???
Daily Kos is KKK of nowadays.
Convention by left wing nuts with “all paranoia conspiracy theories” collected together is OK for free country ( against which these nuts are all trying to make a case ). But any ” reputable ” politician who associates him/ herself with this celebrations of political intolerance is marked as hatemongering for me. You cannot claim USA voters‘ votes and be in KKK in the same time, and the daily kos is KKK of the left today.
Same anti-Semitism, same intolerance , same demagoguery, same KKK-like IDEOLOGY DRIVEN actions , same disregard to the good of own country.
So who are those democrat candidates who are attending this festivity of intolerance in the USA today ??
ALL OF THEM !!
Hillary will attend YearlyKos
I do agree with Patrick who made this comment :
“This is political suicide for them, the majority of America doesn’t
support or read Daily Kos… they are a hateful far left website.
Even the majority of left wingers will be turned off by this. Unless
they change their minds about this, this is going to hurt them long
term I would think. ?”
All main candidates from democratic side had to make their sacrifices on the ALTAR of daily kos. But Dodd went beyond of all of them. may be because he is a biggest looser or may be just he is the most stupid of all of them.
In anyway, today , senator Dodd and Daily Kos are two reasons why I am not a democrat.
I watched the piece with Dodd and O’Reilly on the Fox . For the record: I am not a fan of O’Reilly in anyway. I think O’Reilly is incapable to withstand a serious discussion, he is too self- absorbed and not intellectual enough. I am not a fan of republicans either. I voted republican last time but I feel myself independent after failure of Bush to fight the war as it must be fought ,thinking of our troops first and of anything else later .
So, I am not a partisan person . But what I found out after this segment with Dodd and O’Reilly on Fox is that I am accidentally ( may be )on the right side .I see no nutcases like Dodd on the side of republicans. I see that Dodd was beneath O’Reilly .Dodd was hysterical typical … left nut , because he is typical democrat today ???
Dodd’s logic is that because too many people are visiting daily kos it makes daily kos beyond criticism for, for example , disgusting mockery of Liebermann is the same as anybody would defend pedophiles and sex offenders are using the web to justify their addictions . There are too many people who are visiting pornography and pedophile sites , does it make it justified? Would democrats visit pedophile’s and pornographers’ conventions just because there are many people are visiting sites of that kind? I guess they would, and this is why I am not a democrat today.
Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, Analysis, anti-Semitism, anti-war, daily kos, democrats, Dodd, fox, GOP, Liebermann, O'Reilly, politic, Republicans