according to CNN
“The sharpest exchange in the debate came when Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, was asked about the McCain campaign’s charge that he once said he favored a strict timetable for removing troops from Iraq.
Romney has consistently denied ever having backed a timetable and said McCain was taking a small portion of a quote out of context.
“It’s simply wrong,” Romney said. “By the way, raising it a few days before the Florida primary, when there was very little time for me to correct the record, falls in the kind of dirty tricks that Ronald Reagan would have found reprehensible.” But McCain, the Arizona senator who has strongly backed President Bush’s Iraq policy, accused Romney of hedging after public support for the war waned.”
OK, if it is so why state talker McCain would not say in a few days before the Florida primary that “Romney of hedging after public support for the war waned” instead of lying about Romney embracing a timetable foe withdraw ?
McCain may be right that Romney should support surge back then in more clear words. I would agree with McCain in that.
But I am troubled by the fact that instead of criticizing Romney for not clear enough supporting the surge , McCain start making stories about Romney accepting a timetable. Why in order to make a legitimate point McCain has to lie?
Is it the high moral ground on which McCain is making gains?
Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, Bush, CNN, debate, debates, Florida Republican primary, GOP, Iraq, Massachusetts, McCain, Mitt Romney, politic, President Bush, republican TV debates, Republicans, United States, USA, war, withdrawal
CNN super Tuesday republican debates;
McCain versus Romney:
“ I am a leader and I was leading out of patriotism not for profit.”
Does it mean that McCain is discounting all those who are making a leaving by making a profit by entrepreneurship? Is it enough to be hero to diminish all those who are keeping economy running by making personal profits? How can McCain be a president of the USA if he is mocking the idea of making profit in the USA?
May be he should just apply for position of Defense secretary in Romney administration?
I have no time to write for my blog: business is going very well and takes all my time. However few notes I have to post. As a Floridian republican I am going to vote in Florida Republican primary tomorrow and my vote goes to Mitt Romney!
Why not McCain?
Because , in addtion to everything I wrote previously( here and here):
McCain’s attack on Romney with accusations that Romney has a timetable for withdrawal : it is a lie. And it is disgusting when a candidate such a McCain, who built a campaign on “higher than others moral ground” is lying. The fact that Romney is willing to discuss an end of Iraq war (not a timetable!!!) is a very good sign for me. It shows that Romney is a real pragmatist and as such he sees that we have a mission in Iraq and as long as soon as that mission is completed, we have no further business there. Romney is not for capitulation, Romney is not for withdrawal due to ideology. Romney is for victorious end of the war, is anything wrong with ending the war victoriously and going home? McCain wants us to stay in Iraq forever and wants our troops to serve and protect Iraqis (which is very silly in my view). I do not want our troops there in harms ways serving Iraqis. So Romney position is clear: get the job done, take care of results and then get out!
2. McCain is continuously mocking the fact that Romney is rich and therefore spending his wealth for elections. Since when it is a stigma to be rich in America?
I am for Romney because:
• Romney is smart, unlike McCain (who was ranked fifth from the bottom in a class of about 800 graduates) Romney was a brilliant student
graduated from a joint Juris Doctor/Master of Business Administration program coordinated between Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School. He graduated cum laude from the law school and was named a Baker Scholar for graduating in the top five percent of his business school class. McCain, on other hand, graduated near the bottom of his class from Annapolis Naval Academy. (read more)
• Romney is successful, he is campaigning in depth and seriously (unlike Thompson and Giuliani).
• Romney is a man of moral convictions and does not play with his faith as McCain does: today McCain is “Episcopalian,” tomorrow Baptist, after tomorrow he might be a Mormon.
• He is a successful guy and a proven manager (which by definition make him an excellent leader) as I wrote previously. I see no contradiction between leader and manager.
If not Mitt Romney who can be a better president ?
Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, Baptism, Baptists, Episcopalian church, Florida, Florida Republican primary, GOP, McCain, Mitt Romney, mormon, mormonism, United States, USA, voter, war
How McCain lost me:
#1 New York times endorsement is the real kiss off death. I will never associate myself with a person endorsed by NY times.
#2 global warming: he speaks of global warming? Let Al Gore vote for him!!!
#3 leadership versus management ? This thing is really killing me ! Anybody who has at least a slightest understanding of management can comprehend the fact that any good manager is a leader, otherwise he/she is not a manager. Since when being a manager contradicts being a leader? You want to be a leader but not a manager? Like who? Like Ayatollah? Furer? Like tribal chief?
Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, Al Gore, Global warming, GOP, McCain, Mitt Romney, propaganda, United States, USA, voter
Is Ron Paul popular??? Yes he is! Does it mean that he is right? No, it does not. Why is Ron Paul is popular? Because racism and anti-Semitism still have a lot of fans in this country. Fight anti-Semitism and racism of Ron Paul, fight arrogant isolationism, say a word against Ron Paul. In the meantime….whatever you do, do not say anything, if you want …. after all, KKK have to have somebody to vote for.
OK debates are over. Whom do I like?
None of them! All of them said smart things occasionally (even Paul: about not sending money to Arabs). But none of them have an articulated position which would make me sure that they are ready for dealing with today’s problems.
I will have to vote for one of them because on the other side (democrats) are certified demagogues with no practical experience at all.
Is it not funny how Democrats are picking on the record of Rudy Giuliani and/or Mike Huckabee? Democrats are in excellent position to criticize. They themselves made no mistakes because they never did anything. What Obama or Edwards accomplished other than speeches? Speech about two Americas, Speech about change in America, Speech about two changes in one America, Speech about multiple Americas with many changes… you pick, your choice. But what other than speeches? OK, Obama you are asking for change. Is not a time to change a tune, Obama?
I would say republicans suppose they have an easy target. Against them are a bunch of well trained certified demagogues with no accomplishments and experience. But republicans seem not ready to get this target. Not yet. I start looking on Romney, since “my guy” Duncan Hunter is out.
This guy at least has a proven economic/business accomplishments.
Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, Barack Obama, Bush, Duncan Hunter, GOP, Huckabee, McCain, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Obama, Republicans, Ron Paul, two Americas
Ron Paul: give more responsibility to Israel. Wait a second! USA did impose on Israel the horrible Oslo treaty which cost Israel the Second Intifada and the second wave of assault against Israel from Arab side, and now after initiated by USA Oslo policies did miserably failed, you want to give to Israel a chance for responsibility? It is either hypocrisy or stupidity or may be both.
Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, Abbas, Arab, Arabs, Arafat, Intifada, middle east, Oslo, Ron Paul, Second Intifada
Ron Paul : none of Arab nations wanted Saddam Hussein in Kuwait: Ron you either ignorant or demagogue or both . Palestinians , presented by PLO “Palestine Liberation Organization” and personally by Arafat endorsed Saddam’s invasion in Kuwait
Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, Arafat, debates, fox, GOP, Iraq, Iraq war, Islam, Kuwait, Palestine, Palestinians, PLO, Ron Paul
My fellow bloggers are saying that Kerry endorsed Obama, and Ned Lamont endorsed Barack Obama too. Wait a second, wasn’t Lamont a big looser? Wasn’t Kerry a huge loser as well? May be these endorsements are a liability rather than an asset, is it a coalition of “losers for Obama”?
Watching republican debates on FOX
Ron Paul: republican party is threatening to Iran and Pakistan
Wait a second was it OBAMA who was going to attack Pakistan? Name me one republican who did advocate this idea
Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, anti-war, Barack Obama, debate, debates, fox, Iran, Islamic Republic, Islamic Republic of Iran, Islamo fascism, liberal, Obama, Pakistan, republican debates, republican TV debates, Ron Paul, United States, USA, war