Palin versus Obama

I was going to quit my blog after Mac got nominated. I saw no point to fight. Mac is not my kind of guy. However, Palin’s pick changed the equation for me. I see the point. I see the possibility of real changes for good future, not harmful changes which bring us to past, changes Obama-style.

I am not a fan of MAC (look through my postings) but I think that Obama is a disaster: this circus on the Dem’s convention just proved that he is a cult leader with a bad taste and paranoid ego. He has no ideas other that “us versus them” “trash America first” and “take from rich and give to others.”

Anybody can give a real idea from Obamas’s agenda? I do not see any!

Guy whom nobody knew a few years ago and who did nothing in his life other than reading speeches written or plagiarized by others, is now trashing Palin (using surrogates, of course) for… inexperience. It is funny because Obama/Biden is the most inexperienced ticket in the history of the USA. Other than demagoguery in Congress as a substitute for experience, they did nothing.

Biden spent in the congress all his life!!! He knows nothing but Congress. Same story with Obama (he is just younger and lacking even this ephemeral experience).

If Obama or Biden are such good statesmen, then why congress has such a low approval rating?

Help me understand: they are trashing Bush for low rating but the organization for with the work and of which they, as Democrats, are in charge for last few years already has rating even lower than Bush ?

Please tell me is any other ticket in the USA history has two senators and senators who did nothing than “senating” during their entire life?

Dems got two senators on the ticket, two men who did nothing but reading speeches and writing papers.

And now Palin came!

Palin is a risky choice. But she definitely has executive experience which none of other contenders (including MAC) have.
This is the fact: she is governor. Neither Biden nor Obama ever were responsible for anything concrete: state, city, town, village… nothing! Other that “issues” speeches and words, words, words. If something for what they are responsible in senate goes wrong they always can find excuse (Bush is a terrific excuse for everything for example). When you are mayor of a town it is you who is responsible for the results, not your political opponent. This kind of experience we need now, not demagoguery!

I am considering voting for real change!!! For the real person!
I am considering voting for ticket McCain/ Palin. If she is what we know about her at this moment: a reformer, a governor and a head of the state, a mayor of a town, a  fiscal conservative and a fighter  against corruption, then she is the change, not Obama.

If indeed she is popular in her state which she governs then she is a real deal. Because being popular by reading teleprompter under fireworks it is a different kind of popularity it is a popularity of a pop star not a statesman.

I wonder would Obama handle being a mayor of a town, to be governor and stay popular. I do not know and nobody knows: guy did nothing verifiable in his life. We know about Palin she can do things for real. What Obama did for real in his life?

Palin is the real change which Obama just pretends to be!

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under 2008 vote, 2008 voter, GOP, politic, Republicans, United States, USA

2 responses to “Palin versus Obama

  1. Palin is the real change which Obama just pretends to be! Damn straight!

  2. Thank you Jeff!
    is it not amazing that guy who want to bring us back to 70s is talking about change??

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s