Category Archives: Richard Lindzen

“inconvenient truth” versus “convenient untruth”: the myth about the ” scientific consensus” on global warming.

The global warming movement became a cult with its ideologically driven disregard for real science and focused only on Gore-style convenient untruths

This is understandable because the main apocalyptic idea of global warming cult is that global warming is our apocalyptic punishment for not electing Gore in 2000 and our only redemption is if we will elect him again, otherwise we all will perish because of global warming. If it is not a politic of fear ,then what is it?

Since I posted my note on Global warming cult event, I got a few comments on other blogs that global warming is a scientific concept and that my not accepting the postulates of global warming theory means I am ignoring the science.

Nothing can be a bigger lie or ,misunderstanding than that. The scientific ignorance of global warming cult followers is is a political blessing for cult leaders.

Below is the list of recommended reading and recommended movie to all who are going to enjoy themselves on voodoo style celebration dedicated to the global warming cult:

Could you please educate yourself before enjoying the “anti global warming show”, singing dancing, smoking and drinking????

This move is a must see for all who are opening their mouths about the global warming. You will never see it on PBS

I bet none of those who are going to celebrate own political and scientific ignorance with a mega concert dedicated to Gore and Global warming saw this movie, because it is not Moore.

suggested reading :

1. global warming commentary in London Sunday Telegraph

2. Lubos Motl assistant professor, Cambridge, USA called global warming theory an hysteria. he wrote that ” This hysteria clearly doesn’t depend on science in any substantial way. If you look at these 16,800 articles, most of them are nothing else than pure crap. They offer ever crazier catastrophic predictions and ever more insane ideas how to fight with the alleged “problem” to ever less educated and ever more manipulable readers who are exerting ever more irrational pressure on the politicians. ”

3. according to Richard Lindzen of MIT said on the record all this global warming hysteria:

“Well, I think my read on it is that there is a certain climate of fear, to quote Mike Creighton. You know, for instance, Nye was talking about fresh water perhaps shutting down the Gulf Stream. But that isn’t what physical oceanographers think.

First of all, you know, we’ve measured the heat transport from the tropics to high latitudes. It’s almost all in the atmosphere. The Gulf Stream is mostly driven by wind. To shut it down, you’d have to stop the rotation of the Earth or shut off the wind.

And there’s a lot of confusion in this and, you know, at the heart of it, we’re talking of a few tenths of a degree change in temperature. None of it in the last eight years, by the way. And if we had warming, it should be accomplished by less storminess. But because the temperature itself is so unspectacular, we have developed all sorts of fear of prospect scenarios — of flooding, of plague, of increased storminess when the physics says we should see less.

I think it’s mainly just like little kids locking themselves in dark closets to see how much they can scare each other and themselves.”

4. Thanks to Professor R.M. Carter Hon. FRSNZ (Marine Geophysical Laboratory (Node C) Sporing Road South, James Cook University Townsville, Qld. 4811, AUSTRALIA ) who listed LAYING TEN GLOBAL WARMING MYTHS nobody can tell now that scientific communality did not warn you about scientific flaws of all global warming “theory”

in summary, as Alex Beam, The Globe Columnist on put it there is a myth about the “scientific consensus” on global warming : ” Gore inveighed, more than once. Again, the same message: If you hear tales of doubt, ignore them. They are simply untrue.

I ask you: Are these convincing arguments? And directed at journalists, who are natural questioners and skeptics, of all people? What happens when you are told not to eat the apple, not to read that book, not to date that girl? Your interest is piqued, of course. What am I not supposed to know?

Here’s the kind of information the “scientific consensus” types don’t want you to read. MIT’s Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology Richard Lindzen recently complained about the “shrill alarmism” of Gore’s movie “An Inconvenient Truth.” Lindzen acknowledges that global warming is real, and he acknowledges that increased carbon emissions might be causing the warming — but they also might not.”

But cult members are not listening to those who go against the cult. Cult members are irrationally ( like in any cult ) are following direction of cult leader. They are ignoring everything what is not suited to their mythology . Do not break the party do not give them other science than what they like . After all they will drink, dance, smoke and sing for the sake of some global cause in any way


Filed under Al Gore, Global warming, Richard Lindzen, voter